Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca Insurance

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 2005-06-16

Cited by 156 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted and judgment granted declaring that defendant Seneca Insurance Company is not required to defend and indemnify Great Canal Realty Corp. in the underlying action. The certified question should be answered in the negative. Where a policy of liability i…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.