Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1996-08-14

Cited by 330 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Cook, J., dissenting. I respectfully disagree with the decision of the majority because I agree with the court of appeals that Skivolocki does not dictate the result in this case. The majority cites Skivolocki language, reasoning that “ ‘strip mining is totally incompatible with the enjoyment of a surface estate,’ ” and thus “ ‘a heavy burden rests upon the party seeking to demonstrate that s…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.