Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2006-12-20

Cited by 127 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

O’Connor, J. {¶ 1} This is a discretionary appeal accepted as a case of great general interest pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(1)(A)(3). Appellants Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company (“Lumbermens”), American Motorists Insurance Company (“AMICO”), Hartford Accident Indemnity Company (“Hartford”), Century Indemnity Company (“Century,” as successor to INA), Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, and London Market I…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.