Gillis v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Decided 1993-09-07

Cited by 135 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT SEITZ, Circuit Judge. Leonard Gillis and Váldo Sargeni (“plaintiffs”) are former employees of the Hoechst Celanese Corporation (“Hoechst”). They allege that Hoechst and the Hoechst Celanese Retirement Plan (“Hoechst . Retirement Plan”) have .failed to comply with certain provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.