Gilbreath v. Cutter Biological, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1991-04-22

Cited by 140 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The practical question before us is whether inmates assigned to work at a plasma center operated by a private enterprise are covered by the Federal Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The majority finds that appellants are not in an employer/employee relationship under the FLSA with either the state or Cutter Biological. En route to this conclusion, it overlooks Supreme Court gu…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.