Gilbert v. California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1967-06-12

Cited by 3,795 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Fortas, with whom The Chief Justice joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the result — the vacation of the judgment of the California Supreme Court and the remand of the case — but I do not believe that it is adequate. I would reverse and remand for a new trial on the additional ground that petitioner was entitled by the Sixth and <…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.