Gaskins v. Shiplevy

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1996-08-21

Cited by 116 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. Gaskins essentially asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying his requested habeas corpus relief based on appellee’s return without first conducting an evidentiary hearing and permitting discovery under the Rules of Civil Procedure. Whatever the applicability of a particular Civil Rule, R.C. Chapter 2725 prescribes a basic, summary procedure for bringing a habeas corpus action.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.