Garr v. Peters

Decided 2001-04-10

Cited by 117 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KELLY, J.: ¶ 1 In this appeal, we must determine whether the trial court erred: when it heard the motion for custody modification of Appellee, Michael A. Peters (“Father”), absent a demonstration of changed circumstances; when it transformed a custody hearing into a contempt hearing thereby preventing Appellant, Jeanette Garr (“Mother”), from presenting her case as to the modifi…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.