Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1996-04-04

Cited by 223 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dolliver, J. — The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington asks whether an employer contravenes public policy when it terminates an at-will employee who violated a company rule in order to go to the assistance of a citizen who was in danger of serious physical injury or death. We answer in the affirmative. Plaintiff, Kevin M. Gardner, worked for Defendant, Loomis Armored Inc. (Loom…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.