Fusari v. Steinberg

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1975-01-14

Cited by 440 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Powell delivered the opinion of the Court. This case comes to us on appeal from a three-judge District Court determination that the Connecticut “seated interview” procedures for assessing continuing *380 eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. <span class="citation" data-…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.