Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, defendants, a carpet department store and its president, sold plaintiff-customer a defective carpet at a warehouse clearance sale in violation of the Consumer Fraud Act, *7 N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20. The trial court determined that plaintiffs “ascertainable loss” was the replacement value…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.