Fuller v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 2002-03-27

Cited by 378 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KELLER, P.J., filed a concurring opinion. I disagree with the Court’s conclusion that Malik and Gollihar impose state-law rules, and I write separately to explain how the law of variances operates in the legal sufficiency arena. A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES Due process is the touchstone of the legal sufficiency review, and the standard formulated in Ma…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.