Frysinger v. Leech

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1987-08-12

Cited by 184 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Markus, J. The physician contends: (1) a malpractice action accrues upon the patient’s discovery of the malpractice injury, despite the later termination of the professional relationship, and (2) a Civ. R. 41(A)(1) dismissal precludes a plaintiff’s reliance on R.C. 2305.19 to eliminate the limitations bar. We reject both those contentions, reverse the dismissal judgment, and remand the cause for further proceedings. <p "b93…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.