French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1901-04-29

Cited by 303 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Me. Justice HaelaN, (with whom concurred Me. Justice White and Me. Justice McKeNNA,) dissenting. The special tax bills here in question purport to cover the cost of paving with asphalt a part of Forest avenue in Kansas City, Missouri. The work was done under the orders of the common council of that city, and-the tax bills, it is alleged, were made out in conformity with the provisions of the city charter. <p…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.