Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & Hadden

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1999-04-07

Cited by 313 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Moyer, C.J. The determinative issues in this case are (1) whether it was error for the trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of Karen Bauernschmidt and Arter Hadden as to Siegel’s claim of tortious interference with contract, *176 and (2) whether it was error for the trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of Karen Bauernschmidt and Arter Hadden…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.