Frances D'Aries v. James B. Peake

Decided 2008-04-08

Cited by 358 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

LANCE, Judge, concurring in the result: I concur in the result reached by the Court, but write separately simply to state that my colleague, in his concurring statement, assumes that the Board is vested with the authority to specify the appropriate medical expert to answer the medical question(s) forming the basis of the § 20.901(a) request. As a corollary, he necessarily assumes that the Board is competent…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.