Opinion by Mr. Justice Cohen, The main issues in this case are whether appellee’s conduct constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy or, alternatively, whether appellee intentionally inflicted severe emotional distress under §46 of the Restatement of Torts. On July 30,1960, plaintiff-appellant, Isobel Forster, was involved in an…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.