Forrester v. Stockstill

Decided 1994-01-03

Cited by 121 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION REID, Chief Justice. This case presents for review the judgment of the Court of Appeals sustaining jury verdicts in favor of the plaintiff, Eugene S. Forrester, for compensatory damages against the two individual defendants, Dr. Ronald Stockstill and Dr. Robert Kisabeth, vacating and remanding for a new trial the award of punitive damages against th…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.