NIGRO, Justice, dissenting. Since I find that the Majority’s holding is contrary to the legislative intent of the 1974 amendments to the Act and *381 allows for an unjust and inadequate result, I must dissent. The purpose of the 1974 amendments was to prohibit an employer, contractor or employee from rejecting application of the Act. In eliminating the “el…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.