First Title Co. of Waco v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1993-09-29

Cited by 121 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HECHT, Justice, dissenting. If someone says, “there is no restrictive covenant on your property,” when actually there is, the statement is a misrepresentation. It asserts as fact what is demonstrably false. But if someone says, “I will pay you damages if there is a restrictive covenant on your property,” that statement is not a representation that no such covenant exists; rather, it is a promise that if a covena…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.