First National Bank v. Fellows Ex Rel. Union Trust Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1917-06-11

Cited by 114 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*429 Mr. Justice Van Devanter, dissenting. I dissent from tfie conclusion that this proceeding could be brought and maintained in the state court. It is an information in the nature of a quo warranto against a federal corporation, a national bank. It calls in question the bank’s right to exercise a privilege claimed under an act of Congress, the p…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.