Firestone Textile Co. Division v. Meadows

Decided 1983-11-23

Cited by 196 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STEPHENSON, Justice, dissenting. The majority opinion piously states that we do not abandon the “terminable at will” doctrine, yet a careful reading of the opinion reveals that the doctrine is abandoned. I imagine an ingenious lawyer can nearly always find a right “implicit in a statute,” particularly when such a right can mean most anything as demonstrated by the majority. Somehow this opini…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.