FID. & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1983-09-29

Cited by 103 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the negative. *695 Whether Special Term’s vacatur of defendant’s default in answering was an abuse of discretion as a matter…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.