Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1922-05-01

Cited by 149 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Brandéis delivered the opinion of the court. . The Winsted Hosiery Company has for many years manufactured underwear which it sells to ■ retailers throughout the United States. It brands or labels the cartons in which the underwear is sold, as “'Natural Merino “ Gray Wool ”, “ Natural Wool ”, “ Natural Worsted ”, or “Australian Wool ”. None of this…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.