Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1959-01-12

Cited by 292 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan, whom Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Whittaker join, dissenting. The question in this case is whether appellee Darlington is entitled to rent to transients (that is, so far as this case *94 is concerned, for periods of less than 30 days) a small number of apartments in its building, which is covered by a mortgage insur…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.