Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam

Decided 1994-06-23

Cited by 101 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MARTONE, Justice, concurring in the judgment. The federal constitutional rights of unwed fathers were never at issue in this case. Instead, this case was always about the appropriate standard applicable to the question of abandonment sufficient to terminate parental rights under AR.S. § 8-533QB). The parties did not raise the question of the constitutional rights of unwed fathers because that issue did not…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.