Fall v. Eastin

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1909-11-01

Cited by 284 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Holmes, concurring specially. I am not prepared to dissent from the judgment of the court, but my reasons are different from those that have been stated. The real question concerns the effect of the Washington decree. As between'the parties to it that decree established iir Washington a personal obligation of the husband to convey to - his former wife. A persorial obligation goes w…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.