Ex Parte Williams

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1986-02-19

Cited by 144 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CLINTON, Judge, concurring. That part of Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P., primarily implicated by this postconviction writ of habeas corpus is simple and straightforward: “the court shall admonish the defendant of ... the range of punishment attached to the offense.” However, though the statute is mandatory, Murray v. State, <a href="/opinion/1628029/murray-v-state…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.