Ex Parte Robbins

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 2011-06-29

Cited by 112 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ALCALA, J., filed a dissenting opinion. I respectfully dissent. I conclude that Neal Hampton Robbins is entitled to relief on his application for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that he was denied due process of law by the State’s use of false testimony to obtain his conviction. 1 I. False Testimony The Due Process Clause of the Fourteent…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.