Espinosa v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1993-04-07

Cited by 101 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MALONEY, Judge, dissents with note: Rule 404(b) only requires that the accused present a “timely request” for notice of the State’s intent to introduce evidence of extraneous offenses. As noted in the majority opinion, appellant’s motion for discovery was filed at least one year prior to the trial date in this case. Because that motion bears a certificate of delivery showing that it was delivered to the State’s at…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.