Emily Snead v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation James McIntosh

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2001-01-23

Cited by 336 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

LAY, Circuit Judge, Dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The issue before us is one interpreting the Oregon disability statute. The Oregon law is to “be construed to the extent possible in a manner *1095 that is consistent with any similar provisions of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.” 1 Or.Rev.Stat. § 659.449.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.