Elkins v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California · Decided 2007-08-06

Cited by 208 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WERDEGAR, J., Concurring. I agree that the superior court’s local rule and trial scheduling order were inconsistent with statutory provisions of the Evidence Code and Code of Civil Procedure, particularly the hearsay rule of Evidence Code section 1200. (Maj. opn., ante, at pp. 1354—1363.) I also agree the trial court abused its discretion in excluding petitioner’s exhibits; because the rule and order were inconsisten…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.