Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmber

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1919-04-16

Cited by 608 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Holmes, dissenting. I think that Towne v. Eisner, 245 U. S. 418 , was right in its reasoning and result and that on sound principles the stock dividend was not income. But it was clearly intimated…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.