Eisenstadt v. Centel Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · Decided 1997-05-12

Cited by 193 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

FLAUM, Circuit Judge, concurring. While I agree that the Chicago Tribune article is inadmissible hearsay for the reasons stated in the majority opinion and therefore join the decision, I write separately to express my concern with the potential ramifications of the alleged corporate conduct in this case. The court accepts that even if the representation as to the number of companies who had conducte…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.