Einhorn v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1990-01-10

Cited by 172 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Douglas, J. The issue before us concerns the interpretation of R.C. 1345.09(F)(2) which involves the award of attorney fees to a consumer when a supplier knowingly commits an act which violates the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, R.C. Chapter 1345. The Consumer Sales Practices Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts 3 and unconscionable acts or practices 4</footnotemar…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.