Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided 1997-04-04

Cited by 113 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Sears, Justice, concurring specially. I commend the majority’s foresight in recognizing that a per se prohibition against pro se appearances by corporations is not necessary in certain tribunals, and might, in fact, impose undue hardships. By permitting lay persons to serve as a corporation’s legal representative in courts not of record, the majority has prudently allowed corporations to be represented by n…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.