Easton v. Iowa

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1903-02-02

Cited by 142 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mb. JustiCe Suibas, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. Those portions of the Iowa statute whose validity is the question in this case consist of sections 1884 and 1885 of the code of that State, and are in the following terms: “ Sec. 1884. No bank, banking house, exchange broker, deposit o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.