Dunn v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1997-02-25

Cited by 135 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice Scalia, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I agree with the Court that “the purposes underlying the Treasury Amendment are most properly fulfilled by giving effect to the plain meaning of the language as Congress enacted it,” ante, at 474, which includes options to buy or sell foreign currency. This principle is contradicted, however, by the Court’s extensive discussion of le…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.