Duke v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1997-08-21

Cited by 135 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Durham, C.J. (concurring) β€” I agree with Justice Talmadge that the Legislature did not intend the tolling provision of RCW 4.16.350 to suspend the limitation period after a plaintiff discovers the essential facts of a cause of action. However, I do not agree that the limitation period should be tolled until the plaintiff actually knows the essential facts. An interpretation of RCW 4.16.350 under which the limitation period is…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.