Doucette v. Shulkin

Decided 2017-03-06

Cited by 168 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SCHOELEN, Judge, dissenting: At the outset, I agree with the majority’s assessment that the Board is only required to conduct an extraschedular *374 analysis when the issue is reasonably raised by the parties or by the record. See Yancy v. McDonald, <a href="/opinion/3181074/nathan-yancy-v-robert-a-mcdon…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.