Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2004-09-07

Cited by 111 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Pfeifer, J., concurring in judgment only. *219 {¶ 67} I concur in judgment only because I have several concerns about this case. Judge Puffenberger’s dissent from the report and recommendation of the board so well articulates my concerns that I herein incorporate his entire dissent, except for his recommended sanction. 2…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.