Cavanagh, J. (dissenting). Because I would affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes: The plain statutory language [of subsection 301(5)(c)] is. unambiguous, and it does not permit the magistrate to consider the increased benefits a plaintiff may have been awarded more than two years after her injury under s…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.