DeBurkarte v. Louvar

Decided 1986-09-17

Cited by 121 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WOLLE, Justice (concurring specially). I agree with the bottom line of the majority opinion but would affirm via a much less tortuous path. I have no quarrel with the majority opinion’s disposition of most of the issues raised by defendant: Doctor Rosman was plainly qualified as a medical expert and provided admissible expert testimony; that expert testimony itself furnished the necessary factual support fo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.