Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2000-05-18

Cited by 148 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

NIGRO, Justice, dissenting. Since I believe the real estate exception to sovereign immunity clearly applies to the instant case, I must respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, I see the guardrail as an obvious part of the highway and therefore, cannot agree with the majority’s conclusion that the real estate exception is not triggered by the absence of a guardrail on the shoulder of the road. If, as the majo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.