Davy v. Central Intelligence Agency

U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit · Decided 2008-12-19

Cited by 161 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting: Precedent forces the majority to apply a longstanding test for determining whether to award attorney’s fees. It is time to recognize that this test is a legal relic. It is derived not from the statute but from statements in committee reports, it is inconsistent with now-settled FOIA law that the identity of the requester is irrelevant, see, e.g., NLRB v. Sears, R…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.