David Harbin v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company

U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · Decided 1990-12-27

Cited by 106 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. At issue in this case is the quantum of evidence necessary to survive a summary judgment motion under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (the “FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (1982). David Harbin filed suit against his former employer, the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (the “Railroad”), pursuant to the FELA. Harbin…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.