Yates, J. The first question raised in this case, is, whether the opposition of the plaintiff to the discharge of the defendant in the original suit, under the insolvent *481 act, after the alleged escape had taken place, destroyed his right of action against the sheriff. By this opposition the plaintiff admitted an existing demand against the original d…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.