Darwin v. Connecticut

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1968-05-20

Cited by 212 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I am unable to agree with the basis on which the Court reverses petitioner’s conviction. The courts of the State of Connecticut conducted a careful and conscientious review of the “totality of the circumstances” surrounding petitioner’s three confessions. If the question…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.