Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2003-07-22

Cited by 327 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT JUSTICE CASTILLE. This Court granted allowance of appeal to determine whether the Workers’ Compensation Judge (“WCJ”) in this case failed to adequately explain on the record why she rejected claimant/appellant’s conflicting medical evidence pursuant to Section 422(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”). See 77 P.S. § 834 (effective August 23, 1996). For th…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.