D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1964-01-30

Cited by 112 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PETERS, J. The sole question presented by this mandate proceeding is whether a certain written statement, obtained by a representative of petitioner’s insurance carrier and delivered to its attorney, was privileged as a matter of law, 1 and so protected from discovery, or whether the issue presented was purely factual. We have concluded that the statement of the witness was not privileged as a matter o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.